Tag Archives: photographer

Photoshop Friday: Week #7 - Fixing Under-Eye Circles

Here’s the final edited picture that I’m using today (from a Colorado Springs high school senior portrait shoot–thanks Ashleigh for being the model today)!

colorado springs high school senior portrait

Here is the SOOC version (stands for “straight out of camera” with no adjustments):

The healing brush in Photoshop is often turned to when skin correction is needed. However, I sort of hate the healing brush. It certainly has its uses, but many times the blemish or under-eye circles are near dark areas of the photo (like hair) and it turns the skin grey.

The way around that is my preferred method of spot correcting skin, and that’s to use the clone tool on a separate layer, and then knock back the opacity.

Here are the step by step instructions:

With your photo open, go to LAYERS>DUPLICATE LAYER.

With that top layer selected, use the cloning tool at 50% softness, sample an area directly below the under eye circles (by holding down the control key and clicking on the sample area), and then paint over the darkness.

Then adjust the opacity on that top layer to make it all blend together. This method is great because it leaves a little of the lines/darkness so that your subject will recognize themselves, but just see a newer, better rested self.

Colorado Springs final portrait

Colorado Springs Engagement Portrait Slideshow: Meg and Matt

I love Meg and Matt’s session images so much that I thought I’d share the entire slideshow here. They brought so much energy to the shoot that it was like magic! There are a ton of shots here, so sit back and get comfy.

(For my wedding clients looking to have a session like this, it was held in the rural Falcon/Peyton area east of Colorado Springs and Meg and Matt’s brightly colored clothing was part of the “pop” behind the images.  They came up with the props themselves, so if you have ideas for props, bring them along!  I’m sure they won’t mind if balloons pop up in a few more engagement sessions!)  :)

Scrapbook Saturday–my albums

(I think there are only three people left in the world that don’t know about this method of album-using yet, so this post is for them. For the rest, this might be a little boring.) :)

About two years ago, Tara Whitney shared with the Garden Girls her method of scrapbooking. It was fantastic and I fell instantly in love. The rest of the scrapbook world had moved past “chronological scrapbooking”–scrapbooking their photos in the order they were taken. Photos were now supposed to be scrapbooked as inspiration struck and put in albums or piles haphazardly.

I just couldn’t do that because I’m obsessive. I wanted my photos to be seen in a linear fashion, so I kept an album for each year and filed my layouts accordingly. The problem came when I wanted to try 8.5×11 inch layouts, or when I didn’t know what to do with my digital layouts that I printed as 8×8 layouts (the photo paper to print a layout as a 12×12 is just too expensive to make it feasible). My solution then was to mount anything smaller than a 12×12 on black 12×12 cardstock.

When I saw the new solution, though–using 3 ring American Crafts albums to store a variety of page sizes in a variety of sizes of page protector–I was thrilled. The whole thing looked so interactive and awesome.

Here are a few shots of my 2008 album so far:

Colorado Springs wedding photographer shares her scrapbook albums

Digital layouts get printed as 8×8 (on 8.5×11 photo paper and then cropped), 8.5×11s get housed in their various page protectors (though you do have to punch an extra hole in the landscape oriented 8.5×11s to get them to go into the three ring albums), and 12×12s in theirs.

Because I’m sort of anal about keeping everything in order, I do keep an eye on my album and try to create layouts accordingly. So if I do a 12×12 of pictures in January, I’ll try to do another 12×12 of January pictures. Because otherwise you have an empty backside or a layout that is out of chronological order. But I don’t ALWAYS do that, I live with it if I haven’t (or plan to make a layout to fill that space). (In the case of the cool lace cardstock, I make a layout almost identical to the front on the back of the lace to preserve the see-through look (as shown above).

Ali Edwards recently started using this technique, and I loved her idea for making her own size of page protectors. Will painted his first picture at a neighbor’s house, and I wanted it to go straight into the album–no layout, but just that cute little picture. It was 12 inches wide and 9 inches tall. So I just snipped off the top of a 12×12 page protector to make it fit. (And stapled a little journaling block on there explaining that it was his first painting.)

I love that this method is more free and allows you to scrapbook in a more old-fashioned way–putting things in there of different sizes and shapes that aren’t even necessarily layouts. I think a lot more paintings and report cards will find their way into my albums in the coming years.

It’s a great way to deal with pictures that are too intimidating and important to scrapbook, too–just print them off as an 8×8 or 8.5×11, pop them into the page protector, and maybe add a small journaling block. That way you still get to look at it, even if you’re too scared that the layout you would make wouldn’t be perfect enough!

In many years, when the albums are less a work-in-progress and more a finished project, I plan on transfering them to post-bond albums (I’ll punch new holes in the page protectors if need be). The three ring is fine for now but I do love the way post-bond albums eliminate the center gap and look more formal. So when I’m an old lady in a nursing home, I’ll be sitting there with my hole punch, finishing off those albums.

Photography Tip Tuesday: Week #6 - Lenses (part 1)

Hurray! It’s the day to talk about lenses!

Last week for Photography Tip Tuesday I covered advice for purchasing a camera. This week we get to talk about my favorite subject: lenses. There is a lot to say, so I’ll be breaking this “lesson” up over the course of the week so that no budding photographers give up and stop reading.

Lenses are important investments

Brace yourself: you will probably spend much more on lenses (or at the very least just as much) than you will on the camera body that holds them. But there is good news.

As I said last time, your dSLR is pretty much disposable. You purchase it, it will decline rapidly in value over the next couple of years, and then you’ll upgrade to a newer better model that has made your old body seem ridiculously slow, noisey, and old in comparison (not unlike a first wife–ha ha ha).

Lenses are much better investments. As long as you keep the lens in great condition, you can expect to sell it on ebay or a photography forum and lose only $50-$100! If you purchased the lens on sale or with a rebate, you can even expect to charge what you bought it for–I recently sold a lens for the exact price I purchased it for–all I lost was the shipping fee of $15 (not a bad price for using a lens for five months)!

This is a great argument for purchasing less camera than you can afford in order to buy better lenses than you can afford. When allocating money, the emphasis is safely placed on your lenses–it’s money you can get back. Not to mention that a fantastic lens will make a bigger difference on your images than whether you shoot with a 40d or 5d.

The numbers

When you shop for lenses, the numbers at first look a little alien. Let’s use one of my favorite general-purpose lenses as an example:

Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L

The Canon part is easy–it’s a Canon lens. The “L” at the end stands for “luxury” and means it’s an L series lens–the optics and build quality of the lens are professional. L series lenses also either have a red stripe at the end or are cream all over. This is so that when you’re out and about with your lens other people can ooh and ahh over how awesome you are for having an L series lens. :P

Focal Length

The first set of numbers (24-70) is the focal length of the lens. The higher the number, the more zoomed in you are.

50mm is considered the “normal” focal length. When you look through a 50mm lens, you see what your eye sees. Anything larger is “telephoto” (or seems “zoomed in”) and anything less is “wide.”

50mm lens on 5d - \

telephoto lenses smush backgrounds, making the buildings seem closer

wide angle engagement portrait

These guidelines are based on 35mm film cameras. Most dSLRs have a “crop factor.” (The notable exceptions to this rule are the Canon 5d and Nikon D3). In the case of the Rebel, and 20/30/40ds, they are 1.6 FOVCF bodies, meaning any lens focal length will need to be multiplied by 1.6 to find out its real focal length on that camera body.

So, a 50mm lens isn’t really a normal lens on a Rebel, because it acts like an 80mm (50mm x 1.6) lens.

The next number–aperture

When we bought our first two lenses, I thought we were set for life. We had a 20d, a 24-70 f/2.8 L, and a 70-200 f/4 L lens. In my thinking, we had 38mm-320mm covered (remember that 1.6 FOVCF). We were set. (Luckily Nic knew better and bought me my first fast prime lens–the 50mm f/1.4…and then I was hooked.)

A lot of newbies make that same mistake–looking only at the first set of numbers. The second number, the one after the “f/” is equally important, because it affects how much light you need to take a decent photo without flash.

The lower this number, the wider your lens can open. Why does this matter?

When your lens has a narrow opening, you get a large depth of field–your foreground will be in focus, as well as your background. But because only a little light is getting through, your shutter speed will need to be longer. When your lens has a big opening, your subject will be in focus, but everything else will be blurry. Much more light is able to get in, so you are able to have a much shorter shutter speed.

This is why lenses with a large maximum opening (like f/2.8 or lower) are called “fast” lenses–because they have the ability to open up wide and allow lots of light in, they can have short shutter speeds.

Time for examples. For this group shot, everything is in focus–the feet in front, to the grass in the back.

larger depth of field for a big group

This shot shows a much narrower depth of field–only the front pamphlet is in focus. The rest melt into the background:

shallow depth of field means the booklets melt into the background

Why wide apertures are awesome

When the aperture is wide, not only do you get beautiful background blur (called “bokeh”)…

the individual blades of grass in the field disappear into a pretty yellow blur

…but you have a lot more flexibility indoors and at night. In dark situations your lens will let in enough light that you can still have reasonably short shutter speeds.

The difference at the low end of these numbers is huge. The difference between f/16 and f/11 sounds like a lot, but it is really only one stop of light. f/2.8 and f/2.0 also represents a one stop difference. If the kit lens that a camera comes with is an f/5.6, the difference between it and a good fast lens like the 50mm f/1.4 is four stops of light! You would need a shutter speed four times slower with the f/5.6 lens than with the f/1.4 lens…and that will kill you indoors!

“Image stabilized” or “vibration reduction” lenses [as with the 18-55mm example] compensate for that hand shake, but they won’t compensate for your subject moving all over the place [as with a child]. Image stabilization isn’t a reliable substitute for a fast lens, but it is a great complement.

What is a reasonably short shutter speed?

The minimum shutter speed you can use without getting “hand shake” (blur from your own movement) is relative to your focal length. There is an easy mathematical trick for knowing what your minimum shutter speed is when holding a camera:

1/your focal length

If you have a 50mm lens on a 1.6 FOVCF body, the slowest you want your shutter speed is 1/80 sec. (In this shot I braced myself, held really still and squeezed 1/50 sec out of it)

a fast lens captured this scene without needing a flash

Whew!

I could go on and on and on (and will in the coming days), but for now that is the basic info. Next I’ll cover the lenses in my bag (and the ones that once lived there) and then finally my recommendations for different situations and budgets.

Colorado Springs Family Portrait OpLove Shoot Sneek Peek

OpLove is a non-profit organization run by photographers to give back to the military community. Families with a deploying military member are offered free portrait sessions by OpLove photographers.

I had an OpLove photography session at Palmer Park (one of my favorite Colorado Springs locations) on Saturday. Here are a few of my favorites:

This little girl loves her daddy so much. I love how she looks so much younger in this shot:

father daughter portrait by colorado springs photographer

When I asked her to steal her daddy’s hat (after hearing that she loves to wear it), she corrected me. Apparently it is THEIR hat, not HIS hat.

father daughter portrait

He is equally popular with this little guy. I got a ton of great family pictures of everyone exploring the park.

Colorado Springs wedding photographer captures father and son

I love portraits of a family walking. In this case, there was a lot of laughing and running.

Colorado Springs wedding photographer captures family portrait outside

And this is the inevitable outcome of running and being little. I told them that it was a good thing I have this photo for their lawsuit against me. ;)

Colorado Springs wedding photographer captures falling family portrait